Friday, April 29, 2011

Electoral question re:Newspaper endorsements (updated)

To whom it may concern,

I am concerned that several Canadian newspapers have decided to endorse political candidates in the 2011 election campaign.

While I am not perfectly clear on recent changes and new technicalities, it would seem that their endorsements constitute Third Party sponsorship. The editorials cost the private companies money, through manpower, printing costs and other expenses.

While I understand that 3rd parties can advertise during an election, I was under the impression that they are required to register with Elections Canada.

In particular, I am writing to ask if the Globe and Mail registered as a 3rd party, or if any members of its editorial board registered as a 3rd party. If not, could you please explain why their endorsement is not a violation of current Election financing rules?

Thank you very much for your time, and Thank you for the excellent work you perform on behalf of all Canadians.

Regards,

Elections Canada response (received with 24 hours of query!)

Title,

You are correct that third parties who incur more than $500 for election advertising are required to register. However, the statutory definition of "election advertising" (s. 319 of the Canada Elections Act) specifically excludes from that definition "the transmission to the public of an editorial, a debate, a speech, an interview, a column, a letter, a commentary or news". In accordance with this definition, an editorial or column endorsing a party or candidate is not considered to be election advertising.

I trust this is of assistance.


Not only was the EC response quick, but it was technically specific. To say I am impressed is an understatement.

No comments:

Post a Comment